🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an adorable small “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – called “Onion” – is a big but fiercely protective friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and moves like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a gentle spirit.

A group of thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canadian entertainment facility have been entangled in a disagreement between a defunct facility, local and national governments and animal rights activists.

But those closest to the whales say the intense controversy over their fate often ignores the complexities of the whales who, after growing up in confinement, have been carefully observed by the people who interact with them daily.

After the federal government prevented the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled amusement park near Niagara Falls where they are held warned to euthanize them unless the federal government funds the cost of keeping them alive. The nation’s fisheries minister has denied that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable circumstance.

Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals

Scientists say that belugas’ neural makeup, along with their vocal imitation skills, problem solving and communal behavior indicate they are remarkably smart creatures – something one caretaker observed directly.

She spent several years as a beluga trainer, a job that involved building relationships of the aquatic animals.

“Developing those bonds over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of care. At the outset, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so extraordinary and rewarding.”

The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nonetheless astounded by the nuances and unique traits in their personalities. She formed a deep bond for Eve and Cleopatra with contrasting natures.

“Eve chose me. Cleo made me earn it,” she said. “Both altered the way I understand relationships.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Her interaction with the whales developed against a backdrop of rising activist criticism to their captivity.

During her tenure at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, died. In total, 19 belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a number which the park ascribes to age-related causes, but which advocates say indicates the poor conditions in which they were maintained.

The park did not open to the visitors over the recent season, but the former trainer says she observed directly consequences of the cessation. “Structural materials is deteriorating from the enclosures because they’re in disrepair and not being fixed. The whales are exploratory and so they take pieces and swim around with pieces in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”

The facility did not respond to a inquiry, but previously stated: “The whales … get far better medical attention and 24/7 care than any person in the UK, or other places.”

Fate in Limbo and Proposed Solutions

The former employee was terminated from the facility in early March following the passing of a beluga, an sick beluga the employees had to put down. She said the park believed particulars of the incident were leaked to the media and she was let go not long after.

The ambiguity over the whales’ fate has left her and current and former trainers in despair. She says the park’s threat to euthanize its whales is a leverage tool and is a “logistically impossible” task, adding any attempts to put down even a individual beluga would require “immense personnel”, trucks and specialized tools.

“It’s impossible in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess backs demands for the whales to be transferred right away from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and dwindling staff.

In recent months, Canada’s government official denied a request to send the whales to China.

“Allowing the application would have meant a ongoing situation in enclosure and a reversion to display for amusement,” the minister stated. “As the public, we know that belugas should be in the wild, not in tanks for our enjoyment. I could not in ethical standing permit an transfer that would prolong the conditions these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the official’s comments indicate a broader incorrect perception of the circumstances of life for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The society needs to realize these are whales that have spent their whole lives in enclosed habitats and they will need human care for the rest of their years,” she said. “The public just don’t comprehend that it’s not as simple as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion

As decision makers work to find a resolution, ideas have been put forward, some of which have questionable practicality. An idea called for the belugas to be let go into the open waters of the Arctic – where whales are a key source of food for Inuit communities.

A proposed refuge in the province of eastern Canada, which has received official endorsement, has been contentious. The planned site, which includes extensive space of protected cove, doesn’t yet exist. Proponents remain positive that it could eventually represent a permanent solution for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s spoken with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “merely an trial” in the whales’ well-being.

Others say the prospect of a sanctuary represents a worldwide trend away from animal displays and could represent a workable solution in the coming months.

Charles Vinick, director of the initiative, said the location will mimic the cognitive activities and diet the whales obtain from caretakers, albeit in a significantly bigger environment. He said after the well-being of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|